Product: Electra HM Strat copy
Price Paid: UNKNOWN
Submitted
12/29/2006
at
12:14am
by
alastair c
Features
:
9
mine has a solid white finish, had a few knoks here and there but hay its nealry 20 years old. it looks very much like a jackson
infact, i was convinced it was a ripp off at one point.
LOVELY floyd rose and good whammy sensetivity. with the locks at the top.
not sure about exact year, but its USA
24 FRETS
Sound
:
10
i got the guitar around 8 years ago, i was into alot of metal when i was younger (about 11-12) and its thrashy sound with the EMG humbucker was excelent.
now i am into things liek Pink Floyd and Dire Straits, so i just
whak on the sinle coils, do abit of alteration to my amp settings
and im laughing all the way!. the humbucker still gets used for that style aslo.
Action, Fit, & Finish
:
9
i didnt get the guitar new, but it was ready to go and fealt great
to play.
i just wish that it looked more like a fender stratocaster, oter than a jackson. but its not about what it looks liek is it?
Reliability/Durability
:
8
the guitar will wishstand a great deal, studio, practice, and gigs
but i have had a few occasions of the strap buttons comming loose!
the internal whireing could have been done better though, it lookes very unprofesional soldouring
BUT, this guitar is number one, as i have only had minor problems with the above, and its ready for ANYTHING.
Customer Support
:
No Opinion
Overall Rating
:
9
i have played for 10 years and i think the guitar is awsome!
i would love to buy a normal fender stratocaster for its ''naturaly''
warm tonal qualites.
but dont get me wrong, this one can sound just as good, also i think the HM start is nicer to play (feel-wise)
with a wider range of uses...
if it was stolen i would be devostated, and would have a HM strat
over a normal strat.
i wish it looked more like a fender, and that it could pull off that origonal stratocaster sound a bit better. but lets not forget! THIS IS NOT A NORMAL STRATOCASTER! :)
Product: Electra HM Strat copy
Price Paid: Canadian (220.00) used
Submitted
07/16/2000
at
09:51pm
by
Luc Lachance
Email: luc_lachance at yahoo<dot>com
Features
:
9
A very unusual guitar, I believe made in Japan, probably circa 1988; it featured (if memory serves me well) 22 jumbo frets on a rosewood fingerboard, and plastic dot markers.
I haven't a clue of the wood types used for the body and neck, but by the feather-light weight, I would think it had a maple neck and a body made of either alder or basswood - the dings in the body would point to a soft wood, and basswood is very soft.
It featured dual splittable humbuckers hooked up to push-pull tone pots and individual volume controls, a double locking tremolo system, black chrome hardware and black plastic knobs. Nice contrast with the Ferrari red body finish and jet black neck!
Sound
:
8
A good all-around sounding axe, the splittable humbuckers did yield a good range of tones but lacked a bit of smoothness, depth and warmth.
When I owned that particular axe, I was playing it through a Ross 30W amp, probably the most uninspiring, sterile-sounding POS amp I ever owned ... I often wonder how it would sound rihght now through my Fender Blues Junior had I decided to keep it ... I guess I'll never know!
It was one of those dime-a-dozen Strat copies, but in fairness it was a good one.
Action, Fit, & Finish
:
8
The action was low and comfy,if a bit buzzy. This was a second or third hand guitar, it had a few scars to prove it ... the pickups were set a bit too high - playing certain notes around the 10th fret would produce a weird squeeking noise as the string would rattle against the adjacent polepiece, and the pickup mounting screws were a bit hard to turn (rusted?)so lowering the pickup was near imossible.
On the other hand, the locking trem was effective and kept the guitar in tune.
The neck was a glossy jet black and the body was a nice Ferrari Red, the neck pocket was spotless. The top of the body had a few dings with it, that's why I feel it must be a basswood: light but soft.
Reliability/Durability
:
8
Reliable, yes. I found that the locking trem was of reasonably good quality - kept the guitart in tune - and the action was low and playable.
I was having bad neck problems back then and needed a feather-light guitar, it suited the purpose very well. I jammed with friends a few times with it, but nothing major.
Because of the locking tremolo though, I wouldn't have gigged with it without a backup because if a string breaks, the lock nut makes restringing a royal pain in the keister ...
Customer Support
:
No Opinion
Never had the opportunity ...
Overall Rating
:
8
Overall, this was a good, reliable workhorse guitar, in spite ofits quirks, with a voice all its own. It was originally meant for Heavy Metal, the pickups were very loud and as I stated earlier, the overall sound lacked a bit of warmth and smoothness, but decent enough clean tones could be obtained from it as well.
I loved the weight and action, the locking tremolo was a nice touch as were the splittable 'buckers. Then why, you ask, did I sell it?
Well, I wanted rounder, deeper, smoother tone from the humbuckers and a brighter edge to the single coil tone ... splittable humbuckers are a great commodity, but to my ears, a tapped humbucker doesn't quite sound like a true single coil ... this was a guitar intended for shred heads.
Changing the pickups might have improved the humbucking tone, but it wouldn't have done much for the single coil tone.
I realize that not every player out there can afford 2 electric solid bodies, but for the best tonal range, a Les Paul (or similar humbucker-equipped guitar) should cover the "fat", round 'bucker tones and a Strat (or similar single-coil equipped guitar)should cover the thin, bright, "twangy, quacky" tones.
I've been truely happy once I got a Les Paul and a Strat, but that's another story altogether!
But as a backup guitar, that Electra-Westone was a serious contender!