Yamaha DX-7

The fact that you can't really build a patch in your head like you would with an analogue synth is obviously a bit of a problem. Basically, it boils down to algorithm arrangements, and the manual (downsized considerably from the first-generation DX7) won't be of much help in this respect. Everything else, such as the interface or the carrier/modulator envelopes is much easier, and the LFO works just like on any other synth. To be honest, I programmed very few patches from scratch, and I think my time would be better spent just going through the patch banks from the internet, or editing the classy presets.

The fast but firm keyboard with velocity and channel aftertouch was very much to my taste, and its excellent MIDI capabilities with two data sliders sending programmable CC's make it a competent MIDI controller even today. It accepts ROM and RAM cards to expand or back-up the 128 on-board patches.

A common fallacy about the DX7 is that its sound is a matter of opinion, i.e. either you like it or you don't, simple as that. For a synth that can produce such an amazing variety of sonic textures, I think that's a very conceited thing to say. Obviously, if you're an analogue zealot, you're going to hate it just because it's a DX7 but with the upgraded 16-bit D/A converters and the poly unison/random pitch features, I have a hard time imagining anyone really hating the DX7's sound. It's versatile, it's tight, it goes really deep (the sine wave is the perfect sub-oscillator, after all), it's got lots of polyphony that it can put to good use, and it cuts through the mix better than anything else. I love it.

The DX7s is an extremely reliable instrument, and also a very sturdy one. Unfortunately, this means it's a bit heavy to lug around, especially in a hardcase (the original one was even worse). The only service my unit ever required was to replace some of the membrane buttons which stopped responding due to dust build-up, and its internal construction was so neat that I could disassemble it and take out the PCB myself in order to save on the shop's labour costs.

Being twenty years old, it's obviously no longer supported directly by the manufacturer but fortunately, the after-market service in Slovenia is good for Yamaha instruments.

The mark two DX7 is a brilliant and supremely expressive synths and ranks as one of the most well-rounded instruments ever. If I had to choose a desert island synth, there are very few others in the world - and none I could afford - that could jeopardise its number one spot.

i have an original dx-7. the presets are really cheesy, but i didn't buy it for the presets, i bought it so i could create sounds i haven't heard before. after sitting down with it 3 or 4 times i had a good grasp on creating patches. it was very, very easy for me. i used the manual a little bit, but found it more exciting to stop using it. i never had any other synth before this one, though, so if someone was used to something else it might be hard.

it has a 16 key polyphony, but the MIDI isn't very good. if you're using a sequencer you can only use one voice, and it's not multitimbral. :( i sort of wish i knew that before i bought it. you can get the greymatter e! update which makes the MIDI 100%, but i haven't been able to find one yet, unfortunately. the keys are amazing though. i love the way it feels to play it. it's very fitting and very comfortable to play.

i rememebr right away thinking that the factory presets are very expressive. i hate pressure sensitivity in keyboards though, and i like to have my sequencer play the most important parts, so i won't give an opinion here.

i would definitely use this at a gig without a backup. i have a rom cart and combined with the internal memory i can hold plenty of sounds to play live with. i've tripped over it, almost dropped it... it seems like it would hurt me more than it would hurt itsself if i dropped it.

never had to use it

this was absolutely worth $250. i would definitely buy another, but if i did i would look for one with the greymatter e! upgrade. i've only had this for a few months, and it's my only synthesizer, but it works well with my sequencer and drum machine. the only thing i dislike is the limitations in its MIDI capabilities, such as stated before. i think it's very easy to use, and that all you'd need is a fresh mind to get ahold of it... the sounds are great. sometimes it sounds really analog to me, but i'm not a synthesizer expert. i love the minneapolis funk sound, and i can get some really great janet jackson "control" era sounds on it.

I just found one behind some boxes at a music exchange here in southern CA. Whaen I ask ed about the price (no sticker) , the woman at the store said make me ANY offer. I did just that . . .
Like the last poster, I have wnated one o these since 1987. Spounds like an 80's synth, and as everyone notes - it sucks to program. There are about four or five good patches someone already modded

MIDI was supposedly put onboard before the standard was adopted, but hey, I am no Trent Reznor. I am using it as a controller, the leys work well and the bottins show little sign of use.

Velocity is okay, seems slightly delayed - there is no aftertouch.

Doubles as a weapon! this thing is a tank. I think I got a hernia from picking it up. After 20+ years and this unit works this well? Sold! Much like everyone else who posted here, this thing is bulletproof, and as such, requires no backup on the road.

N/A

Lost/Stolen - I could live without it.
Been playing since I was five , but seriously for the last 15 years on and off. I currently have a 1960's Wurly EP-100 (it's red) and a Yamaha DX7 (finally). Previously owned a Roland D-20, JD-800; Ensoniq EPS 16+(clunky); and some Casio from the early 90's.
I offered $100, and she said it's a deal before I even finished the sentence. Gotta be the cheapest DX7 ever bought! However, no expr, breath controller, or ROMS, but who cares. I needd a MIDI controller and Gutar Center has some two octave POS for $149 that I almost bought last week.

I have always wanted a Yamaha DX7 since I was a kid. I was only 10 when they first came out and remember seeing them on Top of the Pops (played by all the big bands of the day). Just last week my dreams came to reality when I bought my first DX7 off eBay.
The synth is not that difficult to programme like people say. Of course I own other digital synths (one of them being a Casio VZ-1) so I am used to the editing structure.
The synth is 16 note polyphonic which was big way back in 1983 and uses FM (Frequency Modulation) as its sound synthesis but most of the presets are crap. There are only a few good presets like Tubular Bell being one of them. To get the sounds sounding really good I have to edit and programme them myself and then feed them through an effects processor with chorus and reverb. I use my Zoom 1201 fx processor for that. I don't really read manuals so I figured it out myself.

Once I programme my own sounds on the DX7 and put them through an external fx processor the sounds are absolutely stunning, impressive and beautiful. I can get a range of sounds from Industrial distortion to ambient metallic atmospheric sweep textures. The variety of sounds is so unlimited. The MIDI is a bit basic but considering that this was one of the first synths to use MIDI it is understandable. The synth looks good aswell with its futuristic looks and the futuristic original DX7 logo written on the synth. The later DX7 logo used on the DX7s and II FD is not as futuristic looking as the old DX7 logo. The synth is also a dark brown colour.

I have to plug my DX7 into my Zoom 1201 FX processor to get the sounds sounding excellent after I have programmed my sounds to my taste. The sounds are stunning and can sound from Industrial distortion to atmospheric sweep textures. FM is my favourite form of synthesis aswell as Casio's iPD used on the Casio VZ-1.
Not only has the DX7 sound been used on pop records through out the 1980's but the DX7 has been used on television and film soundtracks aswell. It was used alot by the BBC Radiophonic Workshop in the 1980's on shows ranging from Doctor Who to wildlife programmes.

The DX7 is built like a tank. I would have to use an external FX processor with the DX7 if playing live.

Never used it

Excellent!! Classic retro looks and that excellent sound.

The DX-7 is a complicated Synth, especially if you're used to Analogues like me. Pain in the arse to program but it can be done.

You are going to have to put a lot of time and effort into this classic if you want it to shine.

The owners manual is just as complicated as the synth and makes using the DX-7 no easier (unless you read it for ages and ages).

A lot of things to keep you happy with your DX-7.

The DX-7 has a mounsterous 16 voice polyphony so there is no need to worry about running out of voices.

I don't know anything about the DX-7's MIDI but apparently it is very good.

Its a shame there is no arpeggiator but that does'nt bother most people.

So many DX-7 sound cards to get so you never run of new sounds.

The DX-7 is a unique sounding Synthesizer. Nothing sounds quite like a DX-7 (not even a D-50!).

There is a bank of internal sounds which in the DX-7 i played were all organ sounds and lots and i mean lots of external sounds to get which are on sounds cards.

The organ sounds are actully very realistic and you can edit them using the charicter button and make them sound Synthy.

I don't know anything about the DX-7's reliabillity either so no opinion.

Suposablly very good. I know the sound cards are easy to get hold of and cheap.

I did not own the DX-7 i played but i got quite a lot out of it and was very impressed with this legendary FM Synthesizer.

Get one because they just sound awsome. They are cheap, easy to get hold of and great sounding.

A total pain the the arse to edit without soundiver.

Well its unique , sounds like nothing else and has all the features expected.Full midi sopec - no worries here.

Amazing - unique frosty and cyberspace drones.Bells that shiimmer and alien bird noises.Yoiu nakme its got it but will need some work or emagic soundiver to get th ebst from it.I love its sounds - yamaha dx and tx sounds are unique and like nothing else on earth.

solid

never needed it!

Overall its amust have it few love synths and old retro gear like i do.I would advise really taking the time to get into it and also try soundiver with it.The best advice is get the cd thats sold by these guys.Its has 50,000 dx sounds and various editors to program with a pc including soundiver.

http://tinyurl.com/8jjy3

I've owned this keyboard now for almost four years since I last posted a review here and I'm back really just to say that this synth really kicks butt!

The flat control panel isn't like your button-per-function analogue synthesizer I agree but, all the buttons that are available are clearly labelled. You can't do much in the way of realtime editing on the DX7 as is the case with analogue synths or other synths with more controls, but the value slider, if assigned to an edit parameter while in edit mode can be used to alter the sound in realtime. Compared to some of the later digital synths of the early to mid 1990s, there are comparatively more controls atop this synth.

Most of the presets are pretty good, but really shine once we bring multi effects processors (or even just basic chorus and reverb to be honest). Without effects at all the DX7 sounds pretty dry but the effects add depth and make the sounds more natural to the ear.

Editing is done one parameter at a time which in a way makes things easier because you can determine systematically which parameters do what to the sound, in a step by step manner. Programming really is just a case of commiting some time to sitting down at the console and working your way through so if you want to create new sounds in a live situation, this might not be your cup of tea... but I like it and don't find it in anyway difficult - just a bit more lengthy than with an analogue-style control surface.

I managed to download a manual in PDF from Yamaha's website and printed it and bound it in the same way as the original. There is a lot of detail about the FM tone generating system, but I think this is good. I bought a DX7 because I was interested in the physics of this type of sound so for me the manual was an interesting read, which seemed clear and logical. For those wanting to edit and change the sounds straight from the box, this more methodical manner may be a hindrance. I had the manual after I found out how to do the programming so trial and error is also a winning solution here.

Also, the fact that so many people have found the DX7 difficult to program is another reason why I bought it - some commital is required rather than just being able to plug and play like you can with today's things. The additional knowledge you need to make a DX7 sound so good is ultimately what makes this synth retain its professional status more than 20 years after it came off the production line back in '83.

The DX7 is 16 note polyphonic, over the six oscillators (operators in DX-terminology). Since the synth can only handle one timbre at a time then in a lot of instances this isn't much of an issue. For sustained piano lines note-stealing will become audible but for many other types of music this is sufficient. Back in 1983 most other synths were still at maximum eight note poly, many still 1 to 4.

There are no built-in effects on the DX7 which is what makes it sound dated because it sounds so dry. By cleverly using the six operators though, all having independently controllable ADSRs, it is possible to achieve delays and echoes, and with detune, chorus can be implemented, albeit to a limited degree.

Expansion was through the third-party manufactured GreyMatter E! card which I know little about except for you could store 320 sounds in local memory (more to recover if your internal battery dies) and, I think it allowed multi-timbral operation and it could send on any one of the 16 MIDI channels rather than just channel 1 - but I can't be 100% sure - my DX7 doesn't have this.

No sequencer on the DX7 but it does have velocity and aftertouch sensitive keys. The physical keyboard itself is one of the best of its type and even after all these years the keys still retain a fluid, fast motion that caters for fast solos or the tenderest of piano solos. They don't make 'em like this anymore!

Expressiveness... this is what the DX7 was renowned for. With many of the sounds, the harder you play the keys, the more the sound will 'bite'. Take for example the preset program number 15 - Bass 1. If you play harder, the attack will become notably more sharp and achieves a sort of slap effect. The Rhodes electric piano also becomes noticably richer the harder you play the keys.

The architecture of the DX7s sound generating system is also what lends itself to the synths ability to create sounds of uncanny realism - in some respects. Take for example the sound Piano 3 (button 10). In factory default the decay length is a little short so I lengthened it a bit. By dropping the octave down so that you can reach the equivalent octave you'd get on a grand piano, you will be amazed at the way the sound decays, which just isn't possible on a sample based implementation. You've got six operators that are independently tunable, have independent ADSRs and that can be configured to create complicated feedback loops which just isn't possible on some of the more modern stuff (except NI's FM7 which is also great).

Pads were always a weak point for the DX7, but that was before effects processors became cheap. Run some of the string sounds through chorus and delay and you will be surprised at what you can achieve.

Finally, the analogue versus digital war - this is just totally beyond the point. The sound of the DX7 certainly is very unique and (sorry in advance to any analogue fanatics) in some cases much more interesting than analogue implementations. I don't think you can get the same types of animation in the sound as you can with the DX7. At the end of the day, just like any other synth, the DX7 has certainly earned it's place and I will always be a fan of its sounds.

It's also 14bit output on the DAC - so what? this adds another dimension to the character of the sound...

This is pretty well made. I had to tighten a few screws up as I could hear the metal grounding plates rattling in the end cheeks. I'm loathed to say it's built like a tank because if you put any weight on the control panel you can see it move. The whole thing is made from steel and weighs in at over 14KG but some of the aluminium synths such as the Korg 01/w and the Roland D10 feel solid even if you place excess weight on the front panel.

I would probably have used this on a gig without a backup twenty years ago but I'm not sure now as it's getting on a bit and I cannot afford for this synth to die. I would probably sample out the sounds I needed to use the most and get round it that way except being samples, you'd lose that expressive bite.

No comment

This really is a great synthesizer, made even better for those who are enthusiastic about the older, more obscure technologies. FM synthesis isn't something we hear about on the grape vine very often these days but there are countless studios out there who still rely on that famous, unforgettable sound. It came up in computer sound cards and even the Sega Megadrive had an entire FM synthesizer built into it for it's music and sound effects.

Aesthetically, I think this is a great looking machine and still seems somewhat futuristic, in an old-fashioned kind of way if you know what I mean. The membrane control panel has been a frequent gripe by many users but there really are real buttons beneath that surface that have a real click to them. The membrane makes the whole panel perfectly flat and the buttons haven't suffered the same bad contact problems as some of the other older synths like the Roland D50. It still retains professional respect - seemingly to those people who are willing to delve more into the science and physics of sound generation and praise the DX7 for its strengths rather than limitations.

Whether it's to do with the looks, the feel of the keys or just the fact that it is still the most famous synthesizer the world has ever seen, there is still a great feeling from standing behind and playing a DX7. It was a synthesizer that was built in the very heyday of the technology - at the cutting edge of everything, it took 15 years to design... How many other synths can you say that about?

I've had no problem using my DX7, but ther is one little problem. Appearantly there's a button or combination of buttons that mutes it, and I cannot figure out how to un-mute it. This has happened to both of the DX7s that I have used (though it was never me who muted it), so it seems like a pretty standard problem. But other than that, it's real easy to use and is quite self-explanitory.

All of the features are great, except not even the real owner of the keyboard can figure out how to use the memory card. But everything sounds really cool on it. You can change the pitch and the tone, and you can even get realistic car and train sounds. The laser is pretty neat, too.

All of the sounds on the DX7 are very crisp and clear, and have been prgrammed in tune. Everything sounds the way it should, even the #12 setting of flute sounds like a flute would if it went real low.

This keyboard works great for my garage band and for my school jazz band. So long as it's only used by those who know how to use it (it's quite easy to learn how) and so long as you don't press that button that it won't make a sound (unlikely that you would push it) there's absolutely NO need for a backup of any sort. It's good for bass and as a sound-effect tool, too.

I just can't get it out of the soundless mode, but other than that, it's fine.

If this keyboard were lost, I would buy it again, but I'm not all too suree that they even make them anymore, so buying a new one would be very difficult. I don't own any other Yamaha products, but I do have a Baldwin piano and a selmer guitar, clarinet, and trumpet. What I love about the DX7 is thatit's very versital and is easy to play. The only thing the I hate is that it can get muted somehow. It comes in much handiness when I'm writing music and when I need sound effects for a presentation that I can tape-record.

Just recently pick-up a DX-7 MKI from Ebay and after fixing
all the problems including electrical, I am one happy puppy!
I am using DX Librarin by Jon Morgan and let me tell you, I'm not
a music software guru, but this guy can write one excellent piece of software making the MkI manageable.
I can find not only manuals but schmatics and everything in between for this synth.

More then enough for a second keyboard with a variety of incredible sounds. Just picked up a RAM CARTRIDGE off of Ebay made by Symphony with 128 voice storage and I have more than enough voices for any type of music I play.

Without editing any of the patches I have acquired, alot of them sound similar but some are unique enough for me to include them in my voice banks.

I got this synth with a broken upper white key, a cracked side cover with missing plastic, and not working because the power supply was cracked in two. Fixed everything in one weekend and it's working ever since.
This keyboard is a work horse and it's almost indestructible.

Yamaha site still has manuals and patch related documents at their site and many other sites throughout the internet have tons of info for free.
This is GREAT!

I buy another one in a heart beat even if it was in the same condition as the one I got from Ebay. Definitely worth fixing up and using.
Started with accordion when I was eight years old, then got into guitar and now I play strictly keyboards.
Have a Yamaha DGX-500 88 key, My newly acquired DX-7, and I running everything through two Roland KC-150 keyboard amps.

It's not so easy for a beginner. When i first had it in 2001 A.D. it was really difficult to understand how to deal with all that menus. But later i've just started modding the factory presets (on my own risk, cuz i had no factory ROMs and still having problems with MIDI input). The result was that i've lost my girlfriend and started wearing BIG glasses (SHIT! - no backlight!). But hey! - you've got to love it! What i'd reccomend everyone - is to read the lectures of a man who programmed a half of the ROMs - Noritaka Ubukata. They are REALLY helpfull - explaining both DX7 programming and FM synth basics. http://www.digitalmusicworld.com/html/hardware/SynthSeminars/fm-e/index.html

The DX-7 is a whole big feature by itself. It is not only a synth but a lifestyle - you start to recorgnize it's sounds in recordings (trying to figure out the EG parameters used), and it is the one to be a lead in your keybord rack. At studio works I never use internal effects at all, but on gigs i do sometimes miss a nice warm reverb or delay. But i have them both on the mixing desk anyway. I love it's pitch bend and the mod wheels - very nice.

If you want the realism - forget about it! This is not a piano (exccept FANTASTIC rhodes), and not a string or saxophone imitating instrument. This is a synthesizer!From soft and touching pads (used by Enya in all her recordings) to a screaming distorted leads (great for a rock solos - my guitarist hates it!!! :)))))) ), from a soft moogs to a mean FAT benassi-like basses (good for drum and bass and rave lines). By the way - check out that coarse controller menu. You can make a nice techno sound modding it on the bass registers. Sounds like turning Cutoff|Reso knobs on analogue synths if you know what i mean. ((((((((ACID-ROCKS!!!!)))))

This synth can guard itself very well - it is ugly, damn heavy and really sharp edged (MK 1). No one will dare to steal it :)))))) they would better steal another ROLAND or YAMAHA MOTIF 6 :)))) I usually gig with it + yamaha 9000 pro (for strings, pianos and sampling).

Once it's sound output stuff broke right before the gig:(((( Everything was fine but there was no sound at all. I went to the Yamaha Music Gallery - their oficcial dealer in my hometown (Baku, Azerbaijan), they said that it's just an old beast, and recommended to buy a brand new PSR 2100. :(((((( Dumbfucks! Then i've found a small repair shop for a wedding-party masters where it was fixed in a 2 days for $30. If you need an adress - e-mail me ))).

I love it! This is a cult, and no one gets out of it so easy.) I'll never let it go and shurely would buy it over and over again. It's now just a part of my music and nothing would replace it. You can try using FM7 VST plug-in from Native instruments which emulates all the DX keyboards from th 7 MK to a DX 200 but it sounds just like a half of an original. If you want more info - try the www.thedx7.co.uk - lots of links and banks or mail me - i'd like to build a sort of community or something... )

The DX-7 is notoriously difficult to use for beginners, but after a bit of practice, it's not bad at all. Without a manual, I figured out how to make some fairly decent sounds out of the thing, and made better with the manual. Better study up on FM Synthesis and the Physics of sound though.

I've only programmed directly with the unit, but it's hardly difficult after some practice.

The DX-7 has 16 note polyphony I believe, and the keyboard action is soft and plasticky. Hardly feels like a piano, but the sounds are worth compensating the feel.

The DX-7 accepts ROM and RAM cards which are readily available on eBay, plus downloadable patches via Midi can be had from almost anywhere on the net. The DX-7 is capable of Midi (not sure to what extent, I haven't used it)

The sounds on a DX-7 are somewhat cheesy, and out of 32 in each bank on each card, I find myself using maybe four or five regularly on each card. The instruments are pretty fake sounding, but in a live situation, they're great, or for composing, they're even better. It is great for 80's rock, and just about anything slightly techno-ish.

It reacts to the playing with speed reactive keys, the harder you smack it, the louder it is.

It's twenty years old already, gets left on for days at a time, dropped a few times and just keeps going. I would use this thing without a backup on any gig, but I'd bring along others for more realistic sounds.

Yamaha has always been able to provide great responses to the emails. I will likely need to go in to the shop for a quick modification to accept the newer FC-7 volume controller though.

Definately worth $200, I'd purchase again if lost or stolen. I may go for the updated versions, or I may stick to the original. Depending entirely on what's available at the time.

I'm a newbie to keyboards, but find that as a bassist, they provide a lot of extra expressiveness to my composition. I love the fact that it's a DX first of all, and the sounds may be cheesy, but the features can't be beaten for the price. Add all four stock ROM cards, a few aftermarket cards and a few pedals, the DX-7 is possibly THE greatest synth ever made.

After all, programming the DX-7 is not exactly hard. The difficult part about it is getting a decent result. Even if you know what all the parameters are for and what they effect, the result seems rather unpredictable.

I've bought my DX7 about a month ago. It seems of very high manufacturing quality and has lots of features (for its time, of course). Also the sounds I get out of it are very impressive, though it's hard to aim at a certain voice and just program it.

I bought this as a controller, so I was not interested in the sound. The presets are a bit cheesy, good if you are into 80s.

Since I use it as a controller, I just took a MIDI Cable and plugged it into the MIDI out. Very easy!

The Keyboard Action is great, it's still used in Tritons and Motifs today. The wheels are very good. The 32 Buttons are nice for fast program changes. Aftertouch is there, and good to use. Breath Control avaible -> sweet.

I just stepped through the Presets.. Like I said, great for eighties. Nothing for me, though.

Built of solid metal. Sure I would gig without backup.

Never dealt with them.

Why buy crappy platic M-Audio/Evolution if you can have this for the same price.
Really nice controller... cheesy sounds, but the sonic possibilities are high.

Bought the early DX-7, (83), big move for me as I have been playing a Rhodes, Wurlizter, and B-3 and have hated the syth sound, but I need to be just a little more portable. Love the presets, but the patches are VERY time-consuming. I found the manual and LOTS of other things at http://www.math.uga.edu/~djb/html/dx7.html. Greedy people are selling manuals on ebay for 10 bucks!

The polyphony is great, the action takes some getting use to. Need to find a good source for accessories (cartridges, pedals,case,add-ons)

The DX-7 has an unique sound that was used heavily in 1977-1992, still used by pro's today!

Find a good repair guy, I use Audio Repair Specialists in Canoga Park, CA. These guys do quality work on all keyboards. Also fixed my Kurz SP-88 when Kurzweil said they had nobody but the factory to fix.Had a key return bad on the DX and they fixed for $40, and gave it the once over. Seems reliable and sturdy

Find a good 3rd party repair, although Yamaha will repair, but they will try to sell you something new.

Love the sound, am planning to study the doc's and get educated on programming, estimate 6-months+. Will always have a DX-7.

The DX-7 is known for being hard to program, and it sure is. Since this is an FM synth, you don't deal with things like oscillators and filters. Instead, you work with things like operators and algorithms. It's quite confusing if you're used to programming analog synths like I am. Luckily, if you don't want to deal with that, simply use the preset sounds or you can get extra sounds which are available on cartridges.

The DX-7 may not have any built-in effects or stereo sound, but it has a velocity-sensitive keyboard with aftertouch. The DX-7 also has a breath controller input so you can modulate the sound much like a wind instrument. It does have MIDI, but since the DX-7 was released in the early days of MIDI, the implentation is quite simple, but it does recieve SYSEX messages.

While the DX-7 maybe not be capable of analog synth-type sounds, it is however, capable of making very good percussive sounds and a few other sounds which wouldn't be possible on an analog synth. The DX-7 does well for any type of music IMO. If you want good Rhodes sounds, New Age-type bells, and various types of basses in one keyboard, the DX-7 is the one to go to.

I'd defiently gig with this synth without a backup, it's mostly made out of metal and it weighs a ton(!), not to mention the fact that it's completely digital, so you don't have to worry about the synth going out of tune and such.

I haven't dealt with Yamaha yet, but hopefully, with all the support for the DX-7 on the web, I won't need to.

If it were stolen or lost, I'd defiently miss it alot, but I would replace it with another synth, preferably something analog. It sounds pretty good as-is, but I would defiently add stereo sound, chrous/delay effects and a filter to beefen up the sound.

presets are a bit cheesy but u can manipulate them thru editing,no manual,but the person who sold it to me gave me the original dx 7 manual,it helped a bit...if you guys have a manual please,send me a copy..ianQ@eudoramail.com.or switch@thefragile.com

good polyphony,aftertouch is great.fx are godd when u kno your way around it,i have 1 card free when i bought it,dunno how to load other fx tho..i need help from u guys on that one...there is no sequencer,again the manual i have is from the 1st dx7...help:)

some instruments are good,others like brass,bells etc...i really dont need them..wat i need are heavy bass industrial synths...doesnt have that many on the cards...u guys kno where i can download these?:)it really help:)i love playing with it...velocity and aftertouch are cool!:)

dependable,built like a f@ckin tank,u can use it as a weapon also:)hahaha yeah im planning to sample the sounds and use the dx7 for back up effects/sounds live...

jus bought it a few days ago,couldnt keep my hands of it...i hope it doesnt break up...

id buy it again...or buy something more powerful...im jus starting my band,i have the boss dr 202 for beats,the dx7,and im planning to buy and sp 202 or 303?..im still deciding...if the dx7 had a sequencer it would rock my world...its the only thing that limits me and my music..but its an 80s model so what would u expect?:)

I have no idea of what software version I'm using since my DX-7 has been just a controller for the last 12 years. $2200 was a LOT of money in 1981, especially for a USED synth, but that is what I gladly paid for mine. I was one of the first in town to have one, and I actually made few bucks renting it out. I was blown away by the "crystalline" sounds, especially the electric piano ones. But, my quest at the time was for something that would approximate a grand piano sound, and I hadn't heard any synth (Prophet 5 included) that would even begin to allow one to "build" it. When I started dicking around with editing (and yes, I did go slightly insane as many others have), I began to see some possibilities. After 6 months of editing (2 hours a day, every day), I finally came up with what I thought was a passable grand piano patch (I listen to it now and cringe). I had heard other attempts at same from other DX-7 hackers and wasn't impressed. One guy in Nashville had gotten some notoriety from his piano sound. Mike Meros of the Beach Boys sent it to me and I thought it blew. I put an ad in Keyboard magazine, offering a detailed printed sheet of the parameters for $15 or programming any memory carts sent to me. I actually made about $200 selling my "Grand Piano" patch. The manual? What a joke........

I'm a guitar player, and MIDI wasn't something I cared about or bothered to learn until years later when I set up a production studio at home. I've always loved the action of the DX-7. It isn't "spongy" like alot of other synths, and has a very firm "down-stop" unlike most others as well. The biggest problem I am having now is with the velocity range, especially using it with GIGASAMPLER. The DX-7's velocity output is limited from 16 to 109, and is somewhat uneven throughout that range. You'll get increments of "1" from 16 to 29, then the increments increase by 4's, and finally 9's. GIGA users will tear their hair out, especially when trying to use REAL GIGADRUMS and the DX-7 as a controller. No effects, no sequencer. Polyphony is fine (from what I can tell). I never bothered with any expansion stuff, though the "E" thing was all the rage back then.

Hey, there's TWO "S"s in "EXPRESSIVENESS".........The DX-7 was one of the first to have "aftertouch", but I never benefited much from it. The presets were all very "bright" (digital M synthesis...). I especially liked the organ and electric piano sounds. some of the brass wasn't bad...for 1980!

My DX never gigged, so I can't comment on reliability. One time, I had a problem with the keyboard not responding from C-0 ( I think....) up to C-1. So, I took the thing apart. Anyone who has ever taken apart a DX-7 understands the true terror of such an undertaking, and I was convinced that mine would never work again after getting it apart. But lo and behold, there it was - one tiny wire that had been jarred loose from a PC board. I resoldered it, put the thing back together, and....it worked!!

Nada to all above

Don't know what I'd replace it with. I have been looking at other controller possibilities (and would appreciate any input from other GIGA users). again, I am not a keyboard player (thank God for sequencing). The only other keyboard I ever owned was a Rhodes suitcase model which I sold for $200 (and should have been shot for doing so). The DX-7 was the talk of the town in 1981. But when I heard the Prophet 5 a year later..well, I could never have afforded the $5000 that they cost. Overall, my DX-7 has served me well. It's helped me produce hundreds of jingles and msuic beds....paid for itself a thousandfold.

Some 10 odd years ago I bought a TX-7 and a Roland MKB 300 to complement a midi Gulbranson organ and our acoustic piano. I am a keyboard soloist, and at that time I previewed 1000 odd patches selecting selecetd 32 but confined my "playing" to about 8:
- a couple of Rhodes patches ... these are wonderful with some sustain (I do not have reverb)
- an e-Piano patches ....this can complement the thich Gulbranson "theatre organ,
- a Vibe patch ... not strong or realistic below middle C, an equalizer might help
- 2 Bass patches ... OK for effect and intro phrasing,
- a trombone patch that is great as a jazz band! and finaly
- a Jazz Guyitar patch ... this patch has GREAT potential ... but as the MKB-300 has very little "shock-absorption" hammering its keys for the "attack" abuses the finger joints !

No comment as I use an MKB-300

The Jazz guitar, e-piano, rhodes, and trombones are terrific, especially when layered with my Gulbranson. Here you can ripple a jazz riff or play 5 note chords with touch, sustain and tremolo that rival the big bands!

Well I stoped using my "stuff" about 8 years ago. For the 1st two years it was just fine.

Now I am starting up again with XP and USB-Midi.

I am habituated to keyboards and I find that many patches are not suited to a "player". That said, those that are, are no longer a match for the $500US sound modules that are available today.

As a player, I am looking for more reverb and reality in the instruments (patches) that I have mentionned above.

I will keep my TX-7 and MKB-300 uintil I win the lottery!

see others.

enough for that time.

no other choice.

oh yeah

The legand.The sounds of the 80's.kicked M1 and D50 alive on the road and studio producing numerious original sounding hits though it was older. I grew up in asia in the 80's.all the songs and solos are mostly done by DX7,(jupiter 8 and 4 for some exeption).In live every KB player wanted one.they were not satisfied when SY22 came out with sample playback idea.For the look ,it was hotter then hell even until now.Extremely pro looking yet stylish and giving you 'only pros can touch me' look.Those algorithms plate ,under keypad(cool green),the letters,pitch,mod wheel ,all were well done.thanks to design engineers. I've seen it alot on TV and live but my first experience was a knock out awesome.I was there to record and there were an Ensoniq(Mirage I guess),and a Korg Poly ,and DX kicked all of of them. If you have a chance to get one ,grab it. And if you are a pro KB player,have a DX and the racks rather than some funny looking Triton or keyboards from 90's.You will look like a pro and sound like one.Even all pro KB players will respect you. Enough said.

Original version.... early 1980s
Presets are kind of weak, but there are so many downloadable patches for these that really sound great, notably Rhodes and organs.. Download DX manager. It makes SYSEXing a breeze.

Polyphony... don't really remember. Keyboard action is really good. Semi weighted (synth action) keys. No built in effects. Can only take the original RAM and ROM cards.... the only way to get sounds in or out is via MIDI. No sequencer. They sold almost 200,000 of these, they're built like a tank. Even my girlfriend could not wreck it.

Rhodes and organs sound really good. Bass instruments (contrary to what vintagesynth.com sez) I think are weak. Subtereanean sounds get really warbly. Velocity and after touch are good!

Really really reliable. Would (and have) gigged it with no back-up. I'm primarily a bass player, use it for keyboard bass and some hits.

Only dealt with Yamaha customer support once, it's too old for them to support. Their support was HORRIFIC. Total jackasses.

I really like it, works well for a MIDI controller, although program changes do not transmit. Despite the keys being distractingly noisy, the feel is really good. After all, these sold for KING CASH when they were new. Easy to MIDI sounds to it, lots of people still use them!

No software - just buttons. Ya gotta know what yer doin'! Once you do it's a very happy world.

MIDI of course, is not "up to spec". It was one of the first...

It's a Real Synthesizer! Anything sample-based (almost everything, nowadays) is second generation sound, of course.

Had mine 20 years. No problems ever. Not even a battery replacement.

Pretty helpful. I had some questions when I was trying to decide between TX802/816 TG77.

It's a monster. It can do everything you'd ask from a true synthesizer.

Many specific details of this instrument have been covered numerous times, I'll spare you the redundant reading.

<c:

So what's so difficult about the user interface of the DX7? If you are patient and really interested in FM synthesis, you will begin to grasp the DX7 in time. It will take a bit longer to learn than some of the other digital synths out there, but if you love FM it's worth the learning curve. One big boost in learning FM with the DX7 is to commit yourself to load a patch manually, using a data sheet. There are approx. 140 parameters to enter for one patch, it takes awhile. However, I guarantee you will begin to understand the synth better if you take the time to do this.

For those who would rather edit and create patches on a computer screen, there are software editors available that make the synth more 'visual'. I'll rate the ease of use at '7' because each function is directly available on the keypad, so are the patches. Seems pretty intuitive to me.

The keyboard action on the DX7, among semi-weighted keybeds, is among the absolute best. A perfect 10 for playability (weighted keybeds are nice, but packing them around is not for me). Once you play an instrument with the Yamaha FS action (DX7, Korg M1, Triton Classic 61, Motif 61) most others feel lifeless and disappointing. Some of the Rolands (Fantom S 61, XP-60, D50) have great keybeds as well. For me, this is one of the most important features of a synthesizer... if it feels cheap or lifeless, I'm not going to be inspired to play it often. The DX7 needs an outboard effects processor. No need to spend a fortune, an Alesis NanoVerb for $99 is enough to give basic chorus, reverb, delay, and rotary speaker. If you play an assortment of decent DX7 patches for the first time, in mono, no effects... you will be uninspired. Now add effects, something simple, even if just a touch of stereo reverb, and play the same patches. Night and day difference. A bit limited as far as features these days, but hey - 20 years ago, nothing could touch it.

Between the sounds loaded on the synth when I got it, my editing, and loading banks via midi, I have a soundset that I'm reasonably happy with... I gig with a loud rock band and use the following types of sounds: piano (not great, but I've heard worse from newer instruments), electric piano (not the over-bright 'Fulltines', but a mellow, warm FM epiano), flute, organ, strings, perc synth and poly synth type leads, and (my favorite ) Wurlitzer patches.

Seems that some of my favorite sounds, which I would call 'warm' sounding, have a bit of aliasing noise... maybe the DX7 cannot sound warm without some aliasing. I may try a DX7 II someday to see if there is a difference in the aliasing noise.

Responds to velocity and atertouch like nothing else (except the models stated above).

Can you depend on it??? This thing is 20 years old and works like the day it left the factory. It is absolutely the benchmark for reliability, hands down, no contest.

I have to gig without a backup because I can't afford one and wouldn't want to pack an second board anyway.

Customer support? Never dealt with Yamaha, never needed to because they built this product right (as with all Yamaha products).

A product that never needs support... That, my friends, is the ultimate in customer support.

If lost or stolen I would buy another DX7 or DX7 II immediately, and ask almighty God to have no mercy on the soul who took my DX7.

Been playing keys off and on since 1986, recently got serious again and started gigging (primarily play bass, but migrating to half bass, half keys.)

In summary, if you use effects with the DX7 and are interested in FM, you will enjoy this instrument. Guaranteed.

I am not using any software. I am downloading FM-Alive as we speak to try it out. I like the programming structure. Once you visualize the waves in your head, programming becomes second nature.

Love the feel of the keyboard. Synth Action with aftertouch and velocity sensitivity. MIDI is a little slow for modern soft synths (does anyone know how to fix this?). very flexible if you know what you are doing.

Instruments?? I dont think it has 'instruments' its just waveforms made to mimic waveforms, not sample playback. OH yeah! Talk about the 80s. I may have not have lived to see the 80s, but I have heard LOADS of records with these sounds on them. Great stuff!!

EASILY!! This thing can fall from the stage and still keep on working. It can be dropped and still work. It is a tank. I accidentally knocked it against a brick wall. It marked the brick wall (but the white paint was still intact)
YES! My DX-7 is WHITE!!!!

Never worked with Yamaha. But there are HUNDREDS of people who can help with your DX-7. If it breaks and you cant get it fixed...get a new one on EBAY!!

Great board. I use the basses and analoge simulations for my music. Killer electric piano capablilites.


me: kajafan86@playful.com
yup, born in 1986..my DX-7 is older than I am by about 2-3 years