127th AES Convention Coverage (New York, NY Oct. 9-12)

Please direct all questions, comments, or feedback about User Reviews to reviews@harmony-central.com.
Home > Recording > Microphone Reviews > AKG > D550

AKG D550

Summary
Similar Products AKG C 414 B-XL II Condenser Microphone @ Musician's Friend
AKG C 1000 S Condenser Microphone @ Musician's Friend
AKG K77 Headphones @ Musician's Friend
Manufacturer URL http://www.akg-acoustics.com/
Overall Rating 6.8 (5 responses)
Submit a review for this product!

Page: 1 (Show 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 reviews per page) Showing 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
Advertisement
Product: AKG D550
Price Paid: USD 80.00
Submitted 04/27/2009 at 01:34pm by That one guy...

Reviewer Background :
I'm a free-lance composer and lecture music tech. Have been recording at mid-to-high end for past 8 years, after receiving degrees in both music tech and acoustics.

Overall Rating : 8
This mic was recommended to me by the house engineer of an old studio I worked at, with the idea of getting outside my D112 comfort-zone.
At first look the mic is light weight and appears flimsy/plasticy. Also, the mic-stand screw and XLR socket are in the same piece (this can cause issues if using a washer on the mic stand). These aside I have owned this mic for 4 years now, and not a single sign of breakage (studio use only; no live).
In use as a kick drum the results I've derived have varied. I normally test it out in a new kick along side a D112. While the D112 can produce acceptable results almost anywhere, the D550 requires a lot of fiddling to find the sweet spot. I've found close to the beater skin, near the shell gives a great 'click' that I sometimes prefer to the D112, while further out theresult become flabby, and lack 'omph' (that's the technical term!.
However, this weekend I spent a couple of hours on comparison tests for floor toms. In this test the D550 excelled!! I tested it against a D112, M421, Audix F12 (horrible!), and even a Blue Ball (lots of click, not much bass), and frankly, I was so impressed, I thought I'd write this review just to commend the mic! It really held it's own, against industry mics costing several times as much, and destroyed the other mics in it's price range. It really put together a strong transient attack, and just enough bass to thump, without being boomy. This is my new favourate floor mic, rivaled only by the M421! And with regard to positioning; I couldn't find a position at which it didn't complement the floor tom.
So, to sumarise - tempermental on kick, but a go-to mic for floor toms! I just ebay'd a D440, so we'll see if this how that works for rack toms...


Product: AKG D550
Price Paid: UNKNOWN
Submitted 03/01/2009 at 09:43pm by Jeff Huffman
Email: wastedworldproductions<at>yahoo dot com

Reviewer Background :
I have been performing for approx. 25 years and have been recording/mixing for the last 12 years. Mostly in project studio's and the bar scene. I utilize a quad core PC with Sonar 6 Producer and a MOTU 24 i/o for the interface. I have a set of Fostex SS-1 Monitors and utilize several cheap sets of headphones. (these are my next areas of upgrade)

Overall Rating : No Opinion
I bought the AKG D-550 with a complete set of drum mic's. I since have upgraded to Senheiser E604's for snare and high toms and a CAD kbm 412 on the floor tom and a sure beta 52 for the bass drum. I did not like this mic for the bass drum at all. I agree with the other comments that this mic is just to flimsy for the bass. However, it does function well as a floor tom mic. I also agree with the person who said any mic is a good mic in the right situation. I have been trying out the inexpensive vocal mic's that are out and decided to try this one along with several others I currently own (MXL-990, AKG-C5, MK-219 and the CAD KBM-412). To my suprise this mic sounded fantastic on vocals, very clear and it handled the high end well. While I will still try several other mic's I now know that if I need that one additional vocal mic in a recording scenario that this one will perform. Never give up on a Mic!!!


Product: AKG D550
Price Paid: USD 50
Submitted 03/07/2008 at 06:15pm by buefordwilson

Reviewer Background :
I've been making music for about 15 years or so and recording for about 8-9 years. I run through a Tascam 2488 and import into Sonar for a DAW.

Overall Rating : 10
I've seen poor reviews for the D550 as a kick drum mic as well as a need to rig a certain placement for a good sound. However, another user's review on here totally hit the nail on the head. FLOOR TOM!!! If you buy a mic, even a cheap one, then it is your responsibility not to limit yourself on what to use it on. It didn't work good for me as a kick drum mic, but man, you put that thing on a floor tom and you will get ALL the floor tom you need (for a home recording scenario anyway. Got cash? Sennheisser 421 on toms then). Place that puppy up a few inches from the head, angle in toward the center if more stick attack is desired or vice versa and record away. I only paid $50 at Guitar Center for it, so I feel I scored major!!


Product: AKG D550
Price Paid: US $50
Submitted 03/02/2006 at 01:14am by daver
Email: mainmachine<at>choiceonemail dot com

Reviewer Background :
I've been a musician for 11 years, been recording for most of that time. I enjoy making really cheap stuff sound like a million bucks by upgrading, modifying, and sometimes almost re-engineering "budget" gear. I've rebuilt shanghai condenser mics as per both Scott Dorsey and David Royer's designs; re-capped, re-chipped, and re-routed direct outs on my mixer; upgraded the signal path of an Altec 1612A compressor/limiter- the list goes on.

My current recording medium is 24 bit/ 44.1 mHz Roland hard disk recorder. A rebuilt Ramsa 10 channel board serves for preamplification and mixing down to a Tascam CD recorder.

Overall Rating : 6
I bought this mic because it was $50 at GC, and i wanted to try somethig made specifically for the kick drum. Being one of the few people on the planet who has no use for an SM57, this mic seemed like i might not hate it.

Specs: Dynamic, intended for low frequency (bass, kik) usage. cardioid pattern; looks like it's got some kind of resonsnt chamber behind the capsule- a trick initially developed and quite successfully implemented by Electro Voice, IIRC. This accounts for the improved LF response compared to, say, i don't know... an SM57?

This mic is fairly average. The reason i keep it is because with the right placement, it actually can produce some of the best metal-sounding clicky kick drum sounds i've ever gotten. I read about the technique in an issue of Tape Op- it was an interview with a guy named Dave Mattacks, a professional studio drummer who's played for Paul McCartney as well as some other famous folks.

The idea is to use the physics employed by PZM's and boundary microphones. You stick the mic inside the kick, but instead of pointing it at the batter head, you point it more towards the shell than the head, at a distance of about an inch or less from the shell. Since the mic isn't pointing towards your source (where the beater hits the batter), the ratio of reflected to direct sound pressure is increased to the point where you're not actually hearing the direct sound. Crown has a lot of info on their website regarding why this is true, but basically because it's all reflected sounds, evrything is in phase, so you don't have to be concerned about phase problems. You also get a much hotter signal, due to the fact that "in phase" sound waves reinforce each other.

Probably because of the neodymium magnet material and the aforementioned "tone chamber", this is actually not a bad mic. Then again, i'm kind of from the school of "no such thing as a bad mic". Even the most terrible-sounding mic must sound terrible in an awesome way on *something*!


Product: AKG D550
Price Paid: US $50.00
Submitted 04/06/2005 at 07:52am by Ed
Email: ed97643<at>fastmail dot fm

Reviewer Background :
Musician since the early 80s, home recording almost as long, moved from tape to DAW in the mid 90s, but only recording acoustic drum kits for the last 4 years or so.

I have a basement studio, where I have my Sonor / Ludwig / Pearl / Premier frankenstein hybrid drum set, miced up with 10 mics.

Overall Rating : 2
Very lightweight, weak sounding toy of a mic. Do yourself a favor and save up for a better mic.

I am writing this review for the benefit of anyone wanting to get into drumset mic'ing for home recordings or gigging.

I was gradually adding mics to my 9 piece, starting with just one condenser overhead. The bass was getting lost, so on a lark I tried to stick an old SM57 in there. It helped a tiny bit, but I knew I needed a proper bass mic, so for $50 I tried the AKG D550.

I was very disappointed with the D550; it sounded little better than the SM57 that was there before. I needed to crank the bass freq on the mixer to get it to even be heard. I returned it the next day and bought a Shure PG52 (a way better mic, by the way. I make this comparison because lots of people might be considering which one to buy... definitely spring for the Shure.)

The D550 was so light that I was worried about its physical strength. (You would need to use a very stable stand; literally, the cable will be heavier than the mic itself.) The PG52 on the other hand is very hefty and seems like it will be able to take a few knocks.

I spent considerable time trying different mic placement positions along with different board EQ settings, and in the end, nothing made it sound "not weak". Just no balls. (By comparison, the PG52 sounded great even with the board set flat; very full, lots of lows and overall strength.)

I returned the D550 the next day. (Ask your retailer about their return policy before you buy; many chain stores don't allow the return of mics, presumably because of "spittle effect"? you may need to ask them "hey, since this is a bass drum (not vocal) mic, can I return within 24 hours if needed?"? I'm very glad I asked, anyway.)

Another note to budding drumset recorders recording to digital audio: Be prepared to invest in some limiters. I picked up two DBX166XLs (used as limiters only), and they help a lot. Drums are very "peak-ish", and it is easy to clip you?re A/D - D/A inputs. I run bass & snare through one, and mono overhead and summed toms through another. I lose stereo imaging, but I gain by having a much stronger drum sound hitting the inputs without clipping.

Hope this helps. I am very glad I sprung for the PG52; it's helped bring my recordings to the next level. Forget the D550 (for bass, anyway).


Product: AKG D550
Price Paid: US $60
Submitted 04/04/2005 at 12:22pm by Gabriel Lepe

Reviewer Background :
I've been working around studios for 5 years (more or less). I'm a guitar player, but lately i'm working as a sound Engineer. I own a Behringer DDX3216, thru a RME Digi9636 Hammerfall on a Dell P4/2 GHz PC (512 Mb RAM). I can't complain about anything. Sounds really good (It's a bitch for first-timers).

I own 2 Shure SM58's, 3 SM57's and a AKG C3000B.

I've recently Aquired a D550 because I needed to record drums. I thought of a cheap Microphone for bass drum, so it was between a PG for bass drum, or this one.


Overall Rating : 8
The AKG D550 is a bass mic. Dynamic. Cheap.

This is a good microphone. of course, it's no t the BEST or the most appropiate choice for a pro sound, still it's not bad.

I recorded a Mapex Drum PRO M with Sabian AA Cymbals.

The sound that this mic brings on the bass drum is a very punchy, still kinda flat sound. You have put up some EQ for it. It was expected, i guess.

Still I tried it, again, but this time, i used it on the Floor tom. When I heard it i said "That's it! The floor tom!" The mic's job works tremendously great on the floor tom. There can be no other mic that can do the same job like this one. it gives the floor tom a very deep and clear response to the beat of the drum.

If you're gonna buy it, it better be for the floor tom. That's his key of existence. NOT FOR BASS DRUM.

Page: 1 (Show 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 reviews per page) Showing 1 - 6 of 6 reviews

Email: webmaster@harmony-central.com | © 1995-2009 Harmony Central, Inc. All rights reserved.